Archive for March, 2007

Rapture, Ressurection, Heaven and Hell

Wednesday, March 28th, 2007
  • BibleStudy.org - What will happen to me after I DIE? Part 1 - Garner Ted Armstrong
  • BibleStudy.org - What will happen to me after I DIE? Part 2 - Garner Ted Armstrong
  • BibleStudy.org - What will happen to me after I DIE? Part 3 - Garner Ted Armstrong
  • BibleStudy.org - The Return of Jesus Christ: Will his Kingdom be in Heaven or on the Earth? - Garner Ted Armstrong
  • BibleStudy.org - Do believers in Jesus go to heaven when they die? Is heaven the reward of the saved? (Part 1) - Richard Nickels
  • BibleStudy.org - Do believers in Jesus go to heaven when they die? Is heaven the reward of the saved? (Part 2) - Richard Nickels
  • BibleStudy.org - God’s Offer of Eternal Life: The Great White Throne Judgment - Keith Hunt
  • BibleStudy.org - What will happen immediately after our resurrection from the Dead? - James McBride
  • BibleStudy.org - What Happens at Death? Does your soul go to Heaven . . . or some OTHER place? - Richard A. Wiedenheft
  • BibleStudy.org - Do babies go right to heaven when they die? - B. L. Cocherell
  • BibleStudy.org - Where is Enoch and Elijah? Did God take them to heaven or did they die a natural death? - Adriano Borean
  • BibleStudy.org - What are the three heavens? Are there different levels of Heaven? - Don Smith
  • These are suggesting ressurection-only afterlife, all on earth, at the 2nd coming (1st ressurection; saints in Christ) and the post-millennial ‘white throne of judgment’ (2nd ressurection; all other dead). The ressurection involves a new heavenly body. No traditional hell. Only ‘grave’ and ‘lake of fire’. But Satan does exist. They are also ‘no rapture at all’. I checked the context of some of the bible citations (but not all) and they seem alright. There a lot of same-sentence book-jumping and the interpretations are a much more complicated (requiring more intellectual capacity), but still fairly literal interpretation.

    In the “What will happen to me after I DIE? part 2 ” article, I checked some of the verse bible. Context seemed good, but some have a lot of inter-translation translation inconsistency. Lots of room for mistakes and decpetion with all this book jumping and translation inconsistency (especially with the OT books of the prophets), but I’m open to the fact that I may already be deceived by (likely unintentional) falseness. The references in the article are strictly KJV. Isaiah 65:20 is a big example of inter-translation inconsistency. There is a lot of further interpretation based on this inter-translation inconsistent verse.

  • Bible GateWay - Isaiah 65:20 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP
  • Bible GateWay - Isaiah 65:17-25 (entire sub-chapter context) in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP
  • I can’t really give an opinion. I’m still fairly immature in the word (Bible) and I don’t handle metaphor well and I can’t handle idioms much at all. And I haven’t listened to the Pastor’s Rapture series (4 audio CDs; master CD copy made in 1994) despite having already ripped the CDs and put them on eMule (eDonkey network client; P2P File Sharing; I use the MorphXT mod, which is optimized for uploading/releasing) and it having 2 complete uploads already (simple UL - total transfer/ file size) in 1 day (I released it yesterday and checked this morning), much better (in terms of uploaded bytes average per day) than my copyright legal audio bibles (FireFiIghters for Christ, AudioTreasure.com) and Chuck Smith (Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa) c2000 series Bible commentary sermons.

    The church I go to now, Calvary Chapel Tri-City (Tempe, AZ), my ‘growing up’ (my mom making me go in late 1991 @16 to being saved in mid 1992 @17 to mid 1997 @ 22) church, Christian Faith Fellowship Family Church (Middletown, NY; formally downtown; now in a ‘detatched patch’ of Middletown next to the northeast block of surrounding suburban-sprawl with the majority of the congregation not from Middletown anymore and the old downtown building sold and/or abandoned), and also two web sites that I like, RaptureReady.com and Tribulation.com (Rapture Page) are all pre-trib rapture (Jeremy Higgens, appears to be the most supportive of the pre-trib rapture stuff I hear at the calvary tri-city church).

    But then again, another site called ‘Daily Bible Study’ (keyway.ca), seems to be in agreement with the BibleStudy.org site.

  • Keyway.ca Daily Bible Study - Resurrection or Rapture?
  • Keyway.ca Daily Bible Study - The Raptures
  • Keyway.ca Daily Bible Study - The Return of Christ Parables
  • But the above two fails to splice well with the ressurection and ascention into the heavens of the two witnesses or the snatching in the 3rd-to-last paragraph article Watch! article (unless the snatching context refers to the flood instead but that doesn’t make sense either):

  • Keyway.ca Daily Bible Study - The Two Witnesses
  • Keyway.ca Daily Bible Study - Are The Two Witnesses Here Now?
  • Keyway.ca Daily Bible Study - Watch!
  • These references, which I found myself (via study aids), involve Jesus ascending into heaven. I don’t know how relevant this is to the whole ‘rapture vs ressurection’ thing though.

  • Bible GateWay - Mark 16:19-20 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP
  • Bible GateWay - Luke 24:50-53 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP
  • Bible GateWay - Acts 1:6-11 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP
  • Here are the bible references for Enoch and Elijah’s ascension into heaven. The BibleStudy.org site article “Where is Enoch and Elijah? Did God take them to heaven or did they die a natural death?” says they were merely transported elsewhere on the earth and died later. Acts 8:26-40 has Phillip being teleported by the spirit of the Lord (a dead-literal interpretation would have the method of teleportation similar to a ‘Wing of Wyvern’ or a ‘Return’ Spell in the Dragon Warrior 1-4 NES Games), but the the identification of teleportation and the destination was specified within the same 2-verse contextual block. Would they say the same with Jesus and the two witnesses - being teleported and then dieing naturally later without the specification of teleportation and teleport destination in the same contextual block of text?

  • Bible GateWay - Genesis 5:21-24 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP (Enoch)
  • Bible GateWay - 2 Kings 2:1-14 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP (Elijah)
  • Bible GateWay - Jude 1:14-15 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP (Enoch / NT)
  • Bible GateWay - Hebrews 11:5 in NASB, NLT, KJV, TNIV, AMP (Enoch / NT; verse 3-8 linked for context)
  • There are concrete examples that correlate with the ‘pause’ between death and ressurection (christ return or great white throne) from science-fiction sources that puts a person into complete suspended animation or ‘cold-sleep’, whether CyroStasis (JasonX Movie; GURPS Bio-Tech) or NanoStasis (most other sources, especially GURPS Bio-Tech). Older sci-fi sources like 2001/2010 and Aliens just use ‘hibernation’ or ‘cold sleep’. The time in cyro or nano-stasis is literally a ‘blink of an eye’ for the sleeper between the start of stasis and the end of stasis. Stasis emulates death without actually killing the person in order to need hardly any life support (food, water, air, waste disposal), to the person. The sleeper may perceive maybe a few seconds for every decade of stasis, a dead person would perceive absolutely no time at all according to some insights from Ecclesiastes 9:5-10, as no conscious thought occurs within the grave. Even billions or even trillions of years of time passage will be a ‘blink of an eye’. According to the studies above, it will not be millions, billions, or trillions of years though in all the perception is the same.

    For a basic and vague idea, but no means exact insight on our new ressuretcted bodies, watch the movie ‘Cocoon’ or play the game Alpha Centauri (Transcendance victory; transcend elite citizen) game (Firaxis games). If there is any conflict with the bible and the movie/game description, by all means use the bible’s description. These are just for insight for the ability to imagine it a bit. 1 Corinthians 15:35-58 gives some description. There are scatter description all over the gospels of angels in ‘dazzling clothes’ (which I don’t think are brightly colored conventional polyester or nylon dazzle cloth) suggests something like cocoon, but with the descriptions of the ressurected Jesus, especially with the holes in the hands and side suggest some form of shapechanging ability, but I need to study that better as the ‘dazzle’ is largely assigned to angels and the ‘ressurected’ that looks quite human is assigned to Jesus.

    Now I really should listen to Pastor John Higgen’s Rapture CDs and see if he agrees with keyway.ca (Daily Bible Study) and BibleStudy.org , because he is pretty hardcore bible too and may actually agree. In all it is all so confusing.

    Updated 2007-04-02 - Added two more bible references for Enoch’s Rapture

    Bible - Genesis Lifespan Analysis - Pre-Flood vs Modern

    Monday, March 26th, 2007
  • BibleStudy.org - WHY did people live longer BEFORE Noah’s Flood than they did after it?
  • BibleGateWay - Genesis Chapter 5 NASB
  • GURPS 4th Edition 4E - Basic Set - Campaigns - No OCR Mediocre Scan.pdf (I own the paper book too) - Page 444 (P 109 in the .pdf) - Age and Aging
  • ****************************************

    I think the lifespan multiplier for Noah and before is x12 - and the 12 matches up with the 12 tribes of Israel pretty well. I made a chart with a range of possibilities between *8 and *16

    Name Pre-Flood Lifespans Lifepsans divided by 16 (2^4; Extended Lifespan 4) Lifepsans divided by 12 (12 Tribes of Israel, 144,000) Lifepsans divided by 11.31 (2^3.5; Extended Lifespan 3.5) Lifepsans divided by 10 (Oh some greek translator omitted the decimal point) Lifepsans divided by 8 (2^3; Extended Lifepsan 3)
    Adam 930 58.125 77.5 82.2 90.3 116.25
    Seth 912 57 76 80.61 91.2 114
    Enosh 905 56.5625 75.42 79.99 90.5 113.125
    Kenan 910 56.875 75.83 80.43 91.0 113.75
    Mahalalel 895 55.9375 74.58 79.11 89.5 111.875
    Jared 962 60.125 80.17 85.03 96.2 120.25
    Enoch (Raptured) 365 22.8125 30.42 32.26 36.5 45.625
    Methuselah 969 60.5625 80.75 85.65 96.9 121.125
    Lamech 777 48.5625 64.75 68.68 77.7 97.125
    Noah (Genesis 9:29) 950 59.375 79.17 83.97 95.0 118.75

    I think *12 is the most sensible multiplier, when considering a 50/70/90 base aging bracket for aging rolls. 12 really matches up with the ‘12 tribes of Israel’. Also, the new theoretical maximum lifespan that humanity is to settle to is 120 (Genesis 6:3). 120*12=1,440, the theoretical pre-flood maximum lifespan. Slight pattern-match to the 144,000 in Revelation. 12*12*1000=144,000. 12*12*10=1,440.

    The GURPS aging bracket may even be supposed to be 30/50/70 instead, considering the ability deterioration of modern-day professional athletes, and none of the pre-flood patriachs living past age 962 (81 if diveded by 12). I think I would alter GURPS rules to have a 30/50/70/90 bracket with the 30-49 bracket being rolled every other year (1/2 the frequency of the 50-69 bracket). GURPS Space 4th Edition (Alien Creation VI; Lifespan box; page 159) says that going by the billion heartbeat rule, Humans are only supposed to live 30 years. The section explains it off by applying a *2 modifier for intelligent tool-using species, or requireing non-tool using species to take a short Lifespan (1) disadvantage because GURPS balance rules centers on real-world humanity.

    The biblestudy.org site has an exponential curve graphed to Y=487.78*e^(-0.0907*x) where X is the Generation offset and Y is the lifespan, and this curve has a correlation of .889 of the actual ages. It is for the line of Shem, the branch of Noah’s family tree that Jesus is a part of. The other two branches of Noah’s family tree (Japheth & Ham) may need new empirical coefficients for the graph equation, but their lifespans are not documented in the bible, probably because they are irrelevant for Moses and the Messiah.

    GURPS digs up science and reduces it for average-intelligence individuals to have a very realistic and plausible, but usable gaming experience - They even got search warrents served for reality-checking their CyberPunk book by associating with hackers that are on the watchlist

    ****************************************
    GURPS Basic Set: Campaigns — Age and Aging rules summary

    Aging Rolls Start at age 50. Frequency: 1/year @ 50; 2/year (1/6mo) @ 70; 4/year (1/3mo) @ 90 (aging thresholds are 50/70/90). An aging roll consists of a roll of 3D6 vs your HT score (automatically 17 if you have longevity). Repeat the roll for each stat (ST, DX, HT, IQ). A failure reduces the stat by 1. A critical failure (roll of 17 or 18 normally; 18 only if modified HT is 17+; No chance if you have longevity) reduces the stat by 2. Any luck advantages (allow you to choose or re-do a roll each a certain number of times each adventure session) cannot be used on aging rolls.

    Extended Lifspan doubles lifespan and subsequently the aging roll brackets and roll frequencies for each level (2^level; 2 Levels=4; 4 Levels=16). Extended Lifespan 4=16x. Roll every 16 years at 800, every 8 years at 1120, every 4 years at 1440. Short lifepsan has the reverse base-2 exponential effect.

    Aging rolls are modified by [Medical TL]-3 (Stone Age TL0=-3; Roman TL2=-1; Industrial Revolution TL5=+2; Modern TL8=+5). Rolls are further modified by you fitness level (point costing advantage/disadvantage) — +2 for very fit, +1 for fit, 0 for normal, -1 for unfit, -2 for very unfit.

    “Natural Death” occurs when any statistic reaches ‘0′.

    New Testament Cannon broken up into scripture-index categories among the fuzzy-logic spectrum with info from NTCannon.org (Revised)

    Tuesday, March 20th, 2007

    I revised the fuzzy-logic cannon spectrum to not consider heretical ratings at all in the grey categories as I realized the the canon judgement line does not factor in ‘heretical’ ratings. Heretical ratings are now only factored into the three lowest (the most black) categories.

    This resulted in only 3 books changing categories, all in the canon / non-canon grey-zones. James and II Peter were demoted from ‘Canon - Has Blemishes’ to ‘Canon - Grey-Zone’. Apocalypse of Peter was demoted from ‘Non-Canon - Grey-Zone’ to ‘Non-Canon - Rejected’. It is still based on the ??Cross Reference Table: Writings and Authorities??? table at ntcanon.org.

    ************************************************************
    Canon
    ************************************************************
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    The Ultimate (100%)
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Gospel according to Matthew
    Gospel according to Luke
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Definitely Flawless (100%)
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Gospel according to Mark
    Gospel according to John
    Acts
    Romans
    I Corinthians
    II Corinthians
    Galatians
    Ephesians
    Philippians
    Colossians
    I Thessalonians
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Likely Flawless (100%)
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    II Thessalonians
    I Timothy
    II Timothy
    Titus
    Philemon
    I Peter
    I John
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Has Blemishes
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Hebrews (9/11 accepted - 82%; 0/11 Heretical))
    Jude (8/9 Accepted - 89%; 0/9 Heretical))
    Revelation of John (11/12 Accepted - 92%; 0/12 Heretical))
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Grey-Zone
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    James (5/8 Accepted - 63%; 0/8 Heretical))
    II Peter (4/6 Accepted - 67%; 0/6 Heretical))
    II John (5/8 accepted - 63%; 1/8 Heretical)
    III John (4/7 accepted - 57%; 1/7 Heretical)

    ************************************************************
    Non-Cannon
    ************************************************************
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Grey-Zone
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    I Clement (3/4 accepted - 75%; 0/4 heretical)
    Epistle of Barnabas (3/5 accepted - 60%; 0/5 heretical)
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Rejected
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Preaching of Peter (2/3 accepted - 67%; 1/3 heretical)
    Didache (2/5 Accepted - 40%; 0/5 heretical)
    Shepherd of Hermas (4/9 Accepted - 44%; 0/9 heretical)
    Apocalypse of Peter (2/3 accepted - 67%; 0/3 heretical)
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Bad / May be Heretical
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Gospel of Truth (1/2 Accepted; 1/2 Heretical)
    Gospel of the Egyptians (1/2 accepted; 1/2 heretical)
    Gospel of the Hebrews (1/3 accepted; 0/3 heretical)
    Traditions of Matthias (1/1 Accepted; 0/1 heretical)
    Epistle to the Laodiceans (0/2 accepted; 0/2 heretical))
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Likely to be Heretical
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Gospel of the Twelve (0/1 Accepted; 1/1 Heretical)
    Gospel of Peter (0/2 accepted; 1/2 heretical)
    Acts of Andrew (0/1 Accepted; 1/1 Heretical)
    Acts of Paul (0/3 Accepted; 1/3 Heretical)
    Acts of John (0/1 Accepted; 1/1 Heretical)
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Definitly Heretical
    ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a-
    Gospel of Thomas (0/2 Accepted; 2/2 Heretical)
    Gospel of Basilides (0/2 Accepted; 2/2 Heretical)
    Gospel of Matthias (0/2 Accepted; 2/2 Heretical)

    ************************************************************

    Observed pattern of cannon:

    It appears that the hard ??black or white??? line of judgement within the fuzzy logic spectrum for the NT cannon, within the scope of the table at the ntcannon.org site is:

  • At least 51% agreement as ??accepted / true /scripture??? without need of modification
  • No consideration of heretical ratings
  • A minimum of 6 reviews of historically signficant and accepted entities (famous wise individuals, councils, etc).
  • So, basically, minimum of 51% ??yes votes??? with a minimum of 6 total votes. 4/6, 4/7, 5/8, 5/9, 6/10 = ??yes???; 3/3, 3/4, 4/5, 3/6, 3/7 = ??no???

    ************************************************************

    Description of group categories:

    Canon; The Ultimate
    100% marked as accepted excluding ??Marcion and the Macionites??? (Marks nothing as fully accepted) covered by ALL (16) of the authorities in the table
    Canon; Mostly Flawless
    100% marked as accepted excluding ??Marcion and the Macionites??? (Marks nothing as fully accepted). Covered by all-but-two to all-but-one (14-15) of the authorities in the table
    Canon; Likely Flawless
    100% marked as accepted excluding ??Marcion and the Macionites??? (Marks nothing as fully accepted). Covered by at least half but less than all-but-two (8-13) of the authorities in the table
    canon; Some Minor Blemishes
    Most authorites marked as accepted. One or two of the authorities rated as questionable or spourious but still has more than 2/3 acceptance.
    canon; Grey-Zone
    At least 6 reviews; Majority accepted, but not more than two-thirds — 51-67%.
    Non-Canon; Grey-Zone
    Too poor review coverage - less than 6. More than half and at least 3 of the authorities marked the book as accepted, however..
    Non-Canon, Rejected
    Exactly 2 of the authorties marked the book as accepted ‘or’ more than two authorities marked the book as accepted, but it was not more than half (<=50%).
    Non-Canon, Bad / May be Heretical
    Exactly one authority marked the book as accepted ‘or’ no authority marked the book as heretical.
    Non-Canon; Likely to be Heretical
    At least one authority marked the book as heretical and no authority marked the book as accepted.
    Non-canon; Definitly Heretical
    Reviewed my more than one authority; Every reviewing authority marked the book as heretical (unanimously heretical by 2 or more witnesses).

    Emule Screenies - Bible to the World, Lots of Israelies, Spiting the RIAA

    Wednesday, March 14th, 2007

    This one as diverse world representation - Asia, Africa, Oceana, Eastern Europe. 4 of them are downloading bible stuff of which 3 are piracy of copyrighted material — Tyndale NLT Audio Bible - Copyrighted, active lawyers, royalty-demanding, ‘Diet’ RIAA. I’ll be adding 2 copyright-legal audio bibles (800-1200MB) plus Chuck Smith’s Audio bible commentaries (5.2GB) when I get my new hard drives (4 500GB desktop drives in 2 mirrored pairs + 1 spare, 2 non-mirrored 160GB laptop drives) at the end of April (my Dell’s Hard drive is full of DVDs that I don’t have room for elsewhere). These 4 releases (KJV Audio Bible, WEB Audio Bible, Chuck Smith NT, Chuck Smith OT) will be all copyright-legal. Taken 2007-03-10.
    Emule - Afghan in the Upload Queue

    Got three people located within Israel in my currently-uploading list at once! None of them are downloading bible stuff though. A chinese person and a German is though. I my self have been downloading all of the stuff I could find on Mark Eastman, who pretty much quit ministering (apologetic / evangilizing to intellectuals) after quitting his partnership with Chuck Missler. Chuck Missler is very popular on eMule because his stuff is appealing to the paranoid / conspiracy / UFO audience. Taken 2007-03-10.
    Emule - Lots of Israel people

    Look RIAA! I’m downloading craploads of Star Trek, Star Wars, Babylon 5 and other sci-fi soundtracks in album-archives! At least two dozen. Taken 2007-03-08
    Emule - Downloading Soundtracks

    Google
     
    Web www.greatinca.net